|
DEQ backs Boardman closure
By KATHY URSPRUNG
The Dalles Chronicle
The Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) is recommending the state adopt Portland General Electric’s
(PGE’s) haze control recommendation for the Boardman coal-fired
power plant — with a few adjustments — in return for a firm
commitment that the plant will close no later than 2020.
Department Director Dick Pedersen released
the recommendation Thursday, following two public comment periods
earlier this fall. The Environmental Quality Commission is
expected to rule on the matter Dec. 9.
“The plan balances interests as best as
possible,” said Andy Ginsburg, administrator of air quality for
the DEQ. “PGE and the communities in Morrow County felt strongly
that 2020 was necessary to give them time to build replacement
power, address the change in jobs and revenue, and especially to
consider renewable energy sources.”
“The more material you put into the
system, the greater the possibility it could be overloading the
ability of the existing electrostatic precipitator to collect,”
Ginsburg said.
If the new technology does overload the
system, the pollution limits will be adjusted just enough to
prevent the problem, he said.
“But we have a backstop on that, so it
can’t go too far,” he added.
Even if that happens, Ginsburg doesn’t
expect an adjustment would make a material difference in the
downwind air quality. The Columbia Gorge is most often downwind of
the plant in the winter, when winds more commonly blow from the
east.
“You’d have to add a lot of particulate to
create a problem,” Ginsburg said.
“These are stringent controls,” Corson
added. “It pushes the envelope a bit in terms of using the
technology on a boiler the size of Boardman, but we feel it’s
feasible and we want to move forward.” Under the 2009 Best
Available Retrofit Technology (BART) plan for the coal plant, PGE
is now required to install new pollution controls totaling almost
$498 million between 2011 and 2017. The controls would allow the
plant to comply with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) haze pollution rules and stay in operation until 2040.
PGE approached state Environmental Quality
earlier this year to request this less-expensive alternative,
which would give the investor-owned utility time to develop other
energy sources to replace the relatively inexpensive 600 megawatts
of baseload power the Boardman plant provides.
The coal-fired energy plant employs 120
year-round workers and 200 seasonal workers, according to county
officials, with a $7.6 million payroll and a $7 million local tax
contribution.
“I think what they’ve come out with is
consistent with the proposal we put forward, which was a topic of
discussion in the latest round of DEQ comments,” said Steve
Corson, PGE spokesman. “We feel this is a reasonable, workable
2020 proposal for Boardman that gives us time to transition to
replacement power.”
If the state Environmental Quality
Commission approves the plan next week, Corson is hopeful the EPA
will also approve it in the first half of next year.
“We’ve put a lot of work in over the
course of the past year to respond to concerns from regulators,
and other stakeholders as well,” Corson said.
The proposed plan would drop the cost of
haze pollution controls required to keep operating from $497.6
million to $102.6 million for the cost to install dry sorbent
injection controls.
The plan also allows for a pilot test to
make sure the new haze pollutant controls don’t interfere with
mercury controls planned for installation beginning next year. As
the name implies, dry sorbent injection shoots an absorbent
material into the plant’s electrostatic precipitators to capture
sulphur dioxide and nitrous oxide. The technology has been used on
smaller plants, but not one of the PGE plant’s size.
The proposed plan also offers an earlier
out for PGE, similar to the third of three options the DEQ offered
the utility earlier this year. Under terms of that option, PGE
could keep operating until 2015 with limited added pollution
control. That’s the date by which new haze controls would
otherwise have to be installed.
PGE might face that choice if other
factors come into play, Ginsburg said. For example, in October the
utility received a federal notice of violation of air quality
requirements under the Clean Air Act. EPA is currently
investigating the matter, which could become another consideration
in Boardman’s future.
The utility is also facing a stakeholder
lawsuit from a coalition of environmental groups alleging
violations of Oregon and federal air quality rules.
Regardless, PGE is looking ahead.
If the plan wins state and federal
approval, PGE plans to begin working with stakeholders.
“We’ve made an explicit commitment to
customer groups, environmental organizations, employee groups and
other stakeholders to look at what replacement options are
available, and evaluate them as far as our integrated resource
plan with the Oregon Public Utility Commission.”
If the recommendation does gain approval,
Oregon will have a firm closure commitment from PGE for the first
time, Ginsburg said. The DEQ does not have the power to close
plants, only to establish requirements of operation. None of the
agency’s previous proposals has included a firm closure date.
Federal regional haze rules, which the
plan addresses, center primarily on the effects of industrial
pollution on the view quality in designated Class 1 national parks
and wilderness areas. Studies suggest the Boardman plant affects
14 such areas in Oregon, including the Mt. Hood Wilderness, as
well as the Mt. Adams Wilderness in Washington. Under the haze
rules, health is not the central concern. Instead, they consider
the effect of haze on view quality.
However, the closure of the Boardman
coal-fired plant will also have health effects.
“The Boardman plant is the state’s number
one source of greenhouse gases,” Ginsburg said. “This really
changes our profile as a state, depending on what power it is
replaced with.”
|