News Tips
Letters to Editor
Subscriptions
Classified Ads
Contact Info


Gorge Weather


HOME

 


Unique Needs
Keep pressing on school siting plea



Hood River News Editorial
March 7, 2007

What does “unique” mean?

Dictionaries are available for consultation throughout the Hood River County School District to help answer a question that the district has put to the State of Oregon.

It’s really a two-part question: Does the district face “unique” circumstances regarding acquiring land for schools, as Superintendent Pat Evenson-Brady insists it does, and should state land use rules for school construction be bent for Hood River County?

At issue are legal restrictions on siting of school buildings within three miles of an Urban Growth Boundary, and the accompanying high (and rising) cost of land eligible for school construction under current law; reporter RaeLynn Ricarte provides details; click on
School district fights for rural building sites.

Right now, options are supporting House Bill 2465, a piece of remedy legislation with apparently weak legislative legs. HB 2465 would essentially grant Hood River an exemption from the UGB regulations, and allow the school district to build on property west of city limits.

(As things are now, the district can’t even build on land it owns at Wy’east Middle School and has occupied solely as school property for the past half-century: the property is designated for agricultural use even though there has been no farming within its borders since the 1950s.)

The district is correct in wanting to avoid property condemnation — which basically forces property owners to sell their land to a public entity. It’s a disruptive and alienating form of property acquisition. This is especially true of school districts, for they rely on public goodwill for passage of construction bond levies.

So HB 2465 remains the best course to follow at this time. An exemption brings things back to that word: “unique.” It falls to the district, and the community at large, to make the case for the uniqueness of local school land needs.

The fact that Lane Shetterly, director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development, came to Hood River last week to hear the school district’s side of the story is encouraging; he took the time to listen. The schools and supporters should continue to press Shetterly on this issue. Meanwhile, Rep. Patti Smith and Sen. Rick Metsger, who sponsored HR 2465, need to hear from their constituents on this matter.

Smith has said, “This is another example of how we need more flexibility in the state land use system.”

She is right, but flexibility in land use laws is a tough sell in the current political climate.

One factor is certain, and it is the one that drives the entire debate: the schools will keep growing, and this school district needs to build in order to meet the projected enrollment increase, over the next eight years, of up to 2,200 more students.

Ideas Invited

‘Improving Your Community’

As 2007 unfolds, the Hood River News seeks your ideas on how to make our communities even better places to live. In 150 words or fewer, send them to “Improving My Community,” at hrnews@eaglenewspapers.com.

Positive suggestions, either specific or conceptual, are welcome; please include your name and daytime phone number.

We’ll collect and publish the ideas in later editions. Thanks for your ideas.