Senate
Bill 20 continues to hang out at the Capitol like a lobbyist with a
loud suit: attracting attention but detracting from more important
work.
This newspaper reiterates its express
opposition to Senate Bill 20, an ill-advised proposal that would
restrict use of pesticides within five miles of a school.
The Hood River Grower-Shipper Association
figures that, if SB 20 is signed into law, tree fruit production would
be shut down on about 6,000 acres in the valley. The remaining 9,000
acres of farm land would have chemical use even more stringently
regulated.
All but one school in the county (Cascade
Locks) is in proximity to an orchard. But, the lesser-known ramifications of the bill are the
troublesome impacts on the use of pesticides — including ant control
chemicals — in households.
Senate Bill 20 goes beyond farms, but in Hood
River County it is the farms that would feel its brunt. Hood River
growers are justifiably questioning the science behind the bill.
Sen. Rick Metsger and Rep. Patti Smith are
waging a battle against SB 20 emerging from committee and drifting
closer to law. We encourage them to keep at it.
Proponents of the bill need to be reminded of
two things: First, the farmers themselves, in many cases, have
children attending those same schools.
Second, Hood River County orchardists and the
organizations representing them have taken serious steps to adapting
the times and ways they do pest control for the public benefit. SB
provides no conclusive evidence that clamping the economic manacles of
a five-mile no-spray zone around the school will help matters any more
than farmers are already trying to do.