News Tips
Letters to Editor
Subscriptions
Classified Ads
Contact Info


Gorge Weather


HOME

 

 

Douse ‘20’
Spray control bill deserves the ax



Hood River News Editorial
April 14, 2007

Senate Bill 20 continues to hang out at the Capitol like a lobbyist with a loud suit: attracting attention but detracting from more important work.

This newspaper reiterates its express opposition to Senate Bill 20, an ill-advised proposal that would restrict use of pesticides within five miles of a school.

The Hood River Grower-Shipper Association figures that, if SB 20 is signed into law, tree fruit production would be shut down on about 6,000 acres in the valley. The remaining 9,000 acres of farm land would have chemical use even more stringently regulated.

All but one school in the county (Cascade Locks) is in proximity to an orchard. But, the lesser-known ramifications of the bill are the troublesome impacts on the use of pesticides — including ant control chemicals — in households.

Senate Bill 20 goes beyond farms, but in Hood River County it is the farms that would feel its brunt. Hood River growers are justifiably questioning the science behind the bill.

Sen. Rick Metsger and Rep. Patti Smith are waging a battle against SB 20 emerging from committee and drifting closer to law. We encourage them to keep at it.

Proponents of the bill need to be reminded of two things: First, the farmers themselves, in many cases, have children attending those same schools.

Second, Hood River County orchardists and the organizations representing them have taken serious steps to adapting the times and ways they do pest control for the public benefit. SB provides no conclusive evidence that clamping the economic manacles of a five-mile no-spray zone around the school will help matters any more than farmers are already trying to do.