News Tips
Letters to Editor
Subscriptions
Classified Ads
Contact Info


Gorge Weather


HOME

 


Letters - Nov. 1

 

Grateful to Hospice
As a recent article noted, there is conflict within Hospice of The Gorge and I don’t intend to pursue that.
What I do want to say is that my father began Hospice care after the resignation of the five RNs. In the week that he was under Hospice care, I believe that he and our family received quality and compassionate care from all Hospice staff members. I am very grateful to them and their services and believe that this is an extremely important service to provide to families here in the Gorge.
I would also like to thank the PHRMH staff, Doctors Vogt, Peterson and Regalbuto, the Parkdale Fire Department, the Sheriff’s Department, the Department of Human Services and Anderson’s Tribute Center for their support during a very difficult time.
Mary E. Zenorini
Mt. Hood


Yoke with York
Hurray! There is one area wherewith most politicians agree. That is, most schools need more money. But-it’s apparent that not all think that this northerly flow of “educatees” should be a concern.
When Patti Smith first tossed her hat into the ring, I asked her to take note. She is applauded for her support of that 12th Stret stop light while at the same time she seems to approve of a green light at our Southern Border.
And Mr. Metsger is apparently blind of the fact pointed out in a 2005-06 letter to this column titled, “population threat.” Our county’s schools are over crowded now with a Hispanic ratio hovering at 50 percent. Why isn’t he concerned?
My choice: I will yoke with York! Also, the editorial page for that same issue contains a grossly misrepresentation of Measure 43. This measure will not prohibit murder via abortion. However, it does require that the child’s best caregiver be notified.
Shame on you!-who authored that.
Alan Winans
Hood River


Thanks to painters
We had a small turn-out for Saturday’s Paint Day, but it was a good one!
Thanks to our little crew, we now have 17 shiny new-looking doors and door frames. We also have a better sense of the labor and time needed: one volunteer-hour equals one door.
Special thanks to Super Painters, Linda McMahan and Paul Woolery. Thanks, too, to Tony Freni, who supplied us with all the paint and paint tools we needed.
And thank you to all of you who were with us in spirit. We’ll do it again, soon!
Daniel Ward
director, LaClinica
Hood River


VanOrman ‘upgrade’
All of the voters in the Hood River area, that have not yet voted, should be sure and click on www.voteVanOrman.com before filling their ballots.
They have an opportunity, in this year’s State Representative race, for a free upgrade. They shouldn’t miss this chance to get some better representation.
Unlike some years, voters really do have some options on this year’s ballot. They should give this one a look good hard look, and then vote VanOrman!
Joe Trandum
Sandy


Support Smith
Some voting decisions are difficult to make, but whether to vote for Patti Smith to represent District 52 is an easy decision.
Patti Smith is a woman with integrity and outstanding character. She is sincere and deeply cares about the issues that affect her constituents. I appreciate the time she takes to respond to my questions and or concerns. She has never failed to respond to any of my inquiries personally, and in a timely manner.
Twenty-five Associations and four publications endorse Patti. She is hard working and spends many hours conducting our district business. She is an advocate for our schools, children, families, law enforcement, business and veterans just to mention a few.
For these reasons and many more, I have decided once again to give Patti Smith my support and vote to continue her excellent performance as my Representative in District 52. The decision is easy!
Chris Smith (no relation)
Sandy


Thanks, governor
I would like to thank Governor Ted Kulongoski for the hard work and the accomplishments he has made over the last four years. He has helped to get this state’s economy back on track and has made the funding of public education a top priority.
He also has been a leader in developing renewable energy and plans to work towards limiting the greenhouse gas emissions in Oregon. Most importantly to me he has stressed the importance of early childhood education and wants all eligible children to benefit from the proven Head Start program. Children being ready for school are so important to the future of our state.
I found the gubernatorial debates to show me clearly who has the experience and knowledge to serve well as our governor. Ron Saxton focused on stating that he would not impose new taxes, he would make further cuts in the government, and would find efficiencies to save the state money.
I think a lot of cuts have been already made during Kulongoski’s watch and that further cuts would endanger programs that help strengthen and provide safety for our community.
Kulongoski already knows what further he needs to do in this state and he has the experience to help make it happen.
Ron Saxton has little experience in our government and after listening to his rhetoric and unclear vision for our state I urge you to vote for our governor and let him continue working hard to make Oregon stronger and healthier.
Nancy Johanson Paul
Hood River


Voting information
If you are feeling some negative emotions toward all the barrage of negative campaign ads, besides the Voter’s Pamphlet, there is another outstanding source of information.
This source will give you responses of thousands of politicians to their no nonsense questionnaire, Though some politicians have refused to respond to the questions, they found they received greater censor for refusing to respond. This source also gives the comments of competing special interest groups, from conservative to liberal. And you can check their voting record, comparing how they voted with what they say. You can even find out about their previous professions to their latest e-mail addresses. And finally, this source lists who financed them them and for how much.
Just follow the money then vote.
The source is PROJECT VOTE SMART. It is run by volunteers up in Montana, from college students to retired volunteers.
www.vote-smart.org
Judy Nelson
Hood River


Good ‘43’ stance
Many, many thanks for your excellent “No on 43” editorial. There are so many of these ballot measures that make no sense, have huge adverse effects on those who they are purported to help, or have unintended consequences.
You have done a great service to help educate the citizens about the serious flaws of 43. Thanks again.
Hugh and Linda McMahan
Mt. Hood


VanOrman’s voice
I have been greatly impressed by Suzanne VanOrman’s extraordinary accomplishments and leadership in building our Mid-Columbia Head Start program.
As the Oct. 7 Oregonian states, ”No one is running for the legislature this year with more experience and passion for early childhood education.”
Our children need this voice of “experience and passion” in support for education in our Oregon legislature, which seems to consistently come up short of funds to support the needs of top quality education.
And what is of more importance to Oregon’s future than top quality education?
Please join me in voting for Suzanne VanOrman for House District 52.
Kate McCarthy
Parkdale


Vote Smith out
The only one distorting Patti Smith’s record, in this years State Representative race, is Patti herself. She has no choice, with a 95 percent partisan voting record, she has nothing good to stand on. If voters were to ever get an accurate assessment of her overall voting pattern, favoring corporate interests over the interests of her constituents, they would vote her out of office in a heartbeat.
Barbara Kim
Sandy


Say no to Smith
Voters should be aware that our present State Representative, Patti Smith, is among those who favor “civil unions” for same sex couples. She also says that she is looking out for our children’s wellbeing, when she doesn’t even support legal protection for the life of the unborn.
Dan Jones
Sandy


Cluster of lies
After writing to Oregon’s Senator Gordon Smith about the use of cluster bombs, a letter from him on official stationery with the following line was received. “The use of cluster munitions, including large bombs, rockets, and artillery shells, is imperative to the safety of our troops
overseas.” This kind of lie and twisted thinking is unconscionable.
The recent documentary Why We Fight with Dwight Eisenhower’s warning at the end of his presidency about the evolution and escalation of the
military-industrial-congressional complex shows how the problem has grown.
All elected federal Congressional leaders, Democrat and Republican, are responsible for their role in the complex, and for their justifications.
Tom Hons
Hood River


Steak and sleaze ad
The Oregon Leadership Fund thinks we are stupid. Their recent derisive, mocking campaign mailer accusing Rick Metzger of gorging on a $200 steak and lobster meal paid for by lobbyists was a colorful, attention-grabbing promotional piece of mail, but didn’t do much for voters concerned with real issues.
As we volunteer time and scrape to fundraise for our local schools so they can afford technology in classrooms, you’d think we’d receive campaign mailers that address how we can teach kids how to function and compete in a global economy. That’s just one of hundreds of issues the Oregon Leadership Fund apparently doesn’t deem worthwhile.
Does the Oregon Leadership Fund really think this is going to affect my vote? If this kind of sleaze is allowed to succeed, we are all the poorer for it.
Dee Holzman
Hood River


York is informed
I am a registered Democrat. I am writing to you regarding a registered Republican. Her name is Carol York. I do not agree with all her positions every time. I do know of her work and her work ethic as a commissioner: she served on our board for a number of years.
She did her homework and knew issues top to bottom. She considered all sides before forming an opinion. She was objective and honest in giving her opinion ... even if not popular!
In the last several years major issues have confronted the legislative body. Education, economic development, health care, mental health and addictions services, environment, tax reform, etc. In my opinion there has been major gridlock with little movement in addressing the very tough issues facing this state.
I want a candidate that will be informed, consider all sides, and not beholding to special interests. A candidate that knows the special issues confronting Hood River is a plus.
You make up your mind and I will do the same ... we can be civil about this! Please vote!
Sharon Guidera
Hood River


Full protection, please
We pay land tax to Hood River County. Some goes to police protection. In Cascade Locks we pay another large sum of money for police that is to be here 40-hours a week. But why must our business’s now put bars on there windows to keep the bad people out. Where is our protection? It looks bad for visitors to see this. Maybe some of this money should come back to the store owners who aren’t being protected. It surely costs them more.
The blinking lights by the school don’t mean much. No one here to give tickets. Cross walks are a joke, no one to write tickets, and the speed through town is a wreck waiting to happen. At least give us a FULL 40 hours for the money we give you, Sheriff Wampler.
Robert Foley
Cascade Locks


Political choices
I’m not saying I won’t vote, but it’s getting worse and worse. We used to put up with the political whoopla for only a couple of months before the election. Now it’s one or two years. By the time the Election Day is here we have forgotten what they said and not only that, they have changed whatever they were saying. I never knew politicians could open their mouths so much and pass so much gas.
Sure there are some hot issues. The politicians can sure make issues wishy-washy. What happened to their solid statements they would be willing to stand up for like immigration, land use, health care, and the stupid war we involved in. What happened to the grass roots independent candidates? Someone who believes what he or she is saying and will fight for it. I cant blame some for these good people not wanting to get involved. It takes money. So much that people can’t afford it.
The Republicans and Democrats, commonly known as the reds and the blues, are all the same. The greed, corruption and every other thing under the table makes them all look gray.
Some suggestions that might change some things:
Walden, dead wood. Voisin might do a good job.
Kulongoski, dead wood. Saxton-Measure 37 and immigration folks might get some help.
Metsger, really bad. York cross your fingers.
Van Orman, bad news. Patti Smith might do good things.
Jack Roberts out, Linder in
Ballot measure may the best one wind.
The most important, please read the Voters Pamphlet. May your choices win.
Allen Ehl
Mt. Hood


Smith has done well
Patti Smith has done the job for our district. She’s responded to the needs of the local fruit industry, business and organizations by working on bills and issues that provided remedies for real problems. She strongly backs education and has been recognized for her effort with support from organizations like Stand for Children and Citizens Alliance for Responsible Education. She has agreed to sponsor a school siting bill to help our local school district find options for locating a new school building. It seems to me that we have a strong education advocate already in office.
Patti deserves our vote!
Fred Duckwall
Hood River


Linder for Court
Oregon voters will soon elect our next Supreme Court Justice. It is critically important that a Supreme Court Justice be fair, impartial and follow the law. One of the candidates, Virginia Linder, a current Judge of the Oregon Court of Appeals, is just such a person.
Judge Linder served for over ten years as Oregon’s Solicitor General - the State’s attorney in charge of the Department of Justice appeals. Judge Linder’s performance was so good she maintained that job under both Republican and Democratic Attorneys General.
Judge Linder has served on the Oregon Court of Appeals since 1997. She has served with distinction. One of Judge Linder’s primary opponents, Gene Hallman of Pendleton, has endorsed her candidacy in the general election. Judge Linder’s remaining opponent in the general election says that he respects her and that Judge Linder would be a good Supreme Court Justice. He’s right.
I strongly urge you to vote for Judge Linder. This support is based upon personal experience. I have had the privilege of working with Judge Linder in several capacities, including working together for over fifteen months on a task force created by the Oregon Supreme Court Chief Justice to improve the technology used by all of Oregon’s State Courts.
Experience, knowledge, integrity, intellect and fairness. Judge Linder has it all. She should be our next Supreme Court Justice.
Circuit Judge Paul Crowley
Hood River


Yes on 46, 47
Oregonians love to cut taxes. We’ve passed 2 ½ property tax limitations since 1990 and enshrined the income tax kicker in the Oregon Constitution. This November Oregonians will vote on Measure 48, a limit on state budget growth or TABOR. Opponents point out that Colorado voters have suspended the TABOR law they passed in 1992. How did that happen?
In 2002, Coloradoans passed Amendment 27, which put strict political contribution limits in their constitution. This led to Democrats taking control of both legislative chambers for the first time in 30 years. The legislature then referred the TABOR suspension to voters, who approved it.
Amendment 27 is quite similar to Measures 46 and47 on Oregon’s ballot. If you want to see education, environmental protection, social services, and public infrastructure well funded in Oregon, Colorado’s experience suggests that you should vote “yes” on Fair Elections Measures 46 and 47.
Tom Civiletti
Oak Grove


Say no to Metsger
Rick Metsger promises continued promotion of homosexual agenda if re-elected to Senate, in District 26. Last year Metsger voted yes, passing Senate Bill SB-1000, making homosexual “Civil unions” a legal equivalent to heterosexual marriage between a man and woman in all State and local laws, for all purpose. At the Grange Hall in Boring, Oregon, Metsger said “I would do it again.” Fortunately SB-1000 died in the house. Oregon citizens passed Measure -36, defining marriage in the Constitution to be for one man and one woman. Supreme Court ruled Measure-36 constitutional. All citizens have equal right and equal opportunity to marry another person of opposite sex, not marriage laws is shocking. District 26 needs a Senator that represents largest majority of his constituents, instead of pushing agenda of special interest perverted behavior groups. Do NOT vote for Metsger.
William Brookhart
Sandy


Editorial disappoints
I was very unimpressed with your Oct. 25 editorial opposing Measure 43. It began in an encouraging direction with such statements as “Clinically, it makes sense to require parents to be involved in the decision over a serious medical procedure such as this,” then quickly deteriorated into “Measure 43 is a solution looking for a problem.” Nice rhetoric that, but that’s all it was. In fact, your editorial was information looking for an argument. Between quoting recent statistics about teen pregnancy and birth rates and expressing concern about teen alcohol consumption, I wasn’t quite sure which were your “larger considerations affecting young women who face this difficult decision.” Pregnancy rates going down? That’s good — but how is it relevant? The fact is there were over 11,000 abortions in Oregon last year. For comparison purposes, that’s about four times the number of all the U.S. military deaths in Iraq over the last three years. Birth rates going down? I hope that’s good but it can also hide the fact that some pregnancies are being terminated early. And teen alcohol use? Yes, that’s a problem, but lets not confuse things by mixing apples and oranges here — stick to the issue at hand, please. The concern mentioned about the possibility of parental notification leading to teen children being further harmed by abusive parents is a real one, but Measure 43 addresses this by providing a simple and accessible judicial bypass procedure. Let’s put all the cards on the table: The vast majority of parents really do care deeply about and love their kids — and are rightly shocked and outraged that current Oregon law continues to discourage critical family communication and support at a time when a decision must be made that has such potential for harmful and life-long consequences. Legislate family behavior? You bet! — especially if it promotes good communication and will prevent a life sentence of deep grief and regret (or worse) for a young teen — and her family. As a clinician, I have known women who have suffered years, even decades, of suffocating guilt, mood swings, depression, suicidal thoughts, personality changes, marital breakdown and more — all secondary to hastily completed abortions in their teen years, absent of parental notification and support. It’s time to dump the empty political rhetoric and join the other 35 states in this country who have seen the light and embraced the wisdom, logic, and common sense of parental notification for unemancipated minors seeking an abortion. Oh, and one more thing: A minor is defined by Oregon law (per ORS 125.005) as someone 17 and under, not 16 and under as your editorial stated.
James Brauer, M.D.
Hood River


Smith works hard
I would like to put in a good word for our Rep.. Patti Smith. My wife and I live in unincorporated Multnomah County and are represented by Ms. Smith. Over the past two years Patti has been stead fast in working towards a solution to a property rights problem that we, along with other neighbors, have needed. The problem required the diligent efforts and cooperation between several local, county and state agencies which cooperation would not have occurred without Patti’s good work. Patti Smith is a diligent hard working person who I believe represents the interest of her constituents in her role as a State Representative. We urge support for her in the upcoming election.
Brian D. Black and Dianne L. Black
Troutdale


Defend America
Because some claim President Bush shouldn’t have started this war against terrorism, let us review the history of wars in this country. FDR declared war on Germany. Germany did nothing to us. Japan did. Japan thought they would defeat us while we were busy in Europe. Thanks to the courage of the American people and military, this did not happen. Winston Churchill said: “World War II was not necessary if someone in Europe had the courage to stop Hitler early in his plunder of Europe. By not doing so, he ended up being responsible for 152 million people dying. The U. S. lost approximately 250,000 soldiers during World War II. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950 to 1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,334 per year. John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. From 1965 to 1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 lives per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without U.N. or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He also sent troops into Rwanda, Somalia and Haiti when they did nothing to us. He was offered Osama bin Laden’s head on a platter three times by Sudan and Clinton did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. We now have a President who is willing to take on the terrorists to protect us from a future catastrophic event that could kill hundreds of thousands instead of 3000 at the Twin Towers in New York. We must win this war.
Dick Birkett
Hood River


Life is sacred
Life is sacred. Measure 43 is needed to protect our teen daughters or wards. Anti life groups are protecting their million dollar industry by using fear tactics and misinformation. The life of our daughters is precious as is the child within. Measure 43 gives the opportunity for a scared, disappointed teen the chance to take back and seek the guidance of those who allowed her life. There are exceptions built in for cases of rape and incest. A teen, with the help of a counselor or mentor can use the judicial by-pass to seek an abortion. The editor states that we don’t need this measure because teen pregnancies are down? Is that because there are more abortions being performed? Check out the CDC website and click on Abortion; read the part about non-reporting especially between states. The information given at abortion clinics is minimal and misleading and TRUE numbers will never be known. Teens are often taken to abortion clinics by their boyfriends who are several years older. If known, the boyfriends could be facing statutory rape charges. How is allowing them secrecy to do the same crime again helping our young teen girls? Are the parents financially responsible for the procedure complications that can happen? Should the state be held liable? Complications do happen, even death or year of mental pain that can manifest much later. Don’t be fooled! Parents must sign for ear-piercing, a tooth pulled, or to take a Tylenol at school. How much more precious is the daughter’s life and security?
Bobbie Anderson
Hood River


VanOrman, for people
The House District 52 election between Suzanne VanOrman and Patti Smith is an interesting one in many ways. Suzanne recently retired as director of the regional Head Start Program after serving efficiently and compassionately for 22 years. After listening to both candidates, I believe that each is sincere in their beliefs. My vote goes to VanOrman because she wants efficient government and believes that “we the people”—who collectively are the government — can really make a difference in people’s lives through stable funding for schools, wise energy and land use, and affordable health care. One example of this is VanOrman’s endorsement of SB329, which would have allowed Oregonians without insurance as well as small businesses to join in the statewide purchasing pool to reduce prescription drug costs. Smith voted “no” on this bill. Smith has voted with her Republican colleagues 95 percent of the time. This is to me the main reason not to endorse her re-election: she supports and is a member of a party that seems to feel that government should be cutting every social safety net while handing out tax cuts and tax breaks to wealthy donors.
Mary Anderson
Sandy