By
ELSIE DENTON
News Intern
June 15, 2007
Gorge Commission hears
opposition to Broughton Landing
Across the
blustery Columbia River there is an issue that has been coming to boil at
the old Broughton Mill site.
The Stevenson and
Broughton families, which own Broughton Lumber Company and SDS Lumber
Company, are seeking approval to rework the decaying mill into a resort.
According to past comments by Jason Spadaro, SDS Lumber Company president
and spokesperson for the project, the resort would be carefully designed
and would not detract from the scenic beauty of the area.
Even a
meticulously designed resort is outside of current regulations for
non-urban growth within the National Scenic Area (NSA). For the Broughton
vision to become a reality it would require a revision to the Management
Plan.
The Columbia River
Gorge Commission (CRGC), which manages the NSA, is not currently
considering approving the Broughton Mill project. It is looking into
possibly amending the current Management Plan so that the plan could,
under specific conditions, allow a recreation resort along the lines of
Broughton’s proposal.
The next step is
drawing up a draft amendment proposal. According to their current
timeline, CRGC staff hope to have the proposal ready sometime next month.
Spadaro points out
that a resort has the potential to be beneficial to the surrounding
communities. The Skamania County Economic Development Council says that
the county is suffering from a “trade leakage” of $45 million. This loss
of tourism dollars is not unique to Skamania but shared by other
Washington communities, all of whom feel the pinch as dollars flow across
the river to Hood River.
Broughton sources
say that the project will help infuse economies on the Washington side of
the River by attracting higher-income tourists.
Spadaro has also
said that the resort will provide 60 full-time jobs upon completion and
three to five years of construction work.
The mill site,
located directly across the Columbia River from Hood River, would be
developed to include 245 vacation units; including a mix of cabins,
condominiums and town houses, according to Broughton sources. Current NSA
regulation limits development to 25 to 35 cabins and 175 campsite or RV
stalls outside of urban areas.
Development isn’t
fundamentally against the guiding principles of the NSA Act. The mission
statement for the CRGC states that it should allow “economic development
that is consistent with resource protection,” particularly if it enhances
scenic, cultural and recreational opportunities in the Gorge.
According to
Broughton’s preliminary plan and economic assessments a resort and the
Broughton Landing site will do just that. The resort will add 14 miles of
trails to which they will allow public access, and will open its own
private windsurfing launch site in addition to the nearby Hatchery site.
The Broughton
planning team also intends to preserve the feel of the old mill site after
renovation. They estimate that they will generate an additional $1 to $1.4
million in extra tax revenues annually for Skamania County. Broughton’s
economic estimates do not yet include adjustments for the extra strain the
resort would put on public services.
Over the last two
months the CRGC held two public workshops designed to help pinpoint issues
and concerns that must be considered in drafting any changes to the
current Management Plan. The first was help on May 30 and the second on
June 11.
Written testimony
provided online by CRGC after the May meeting shows that public opinion is
divided over the proposed resort. One commenter in favor of the resort
said, “What is seen as the justification for leaving a decaying mill
site…rather than allow a vibrant, dynamic and picturesque recreational
resort so carefully designed to preserve scenic beauty, cultural aspects
and enhance natural resources through recreation?”
Another commenter
felt that the impact of such a large resort would outweigh its benefits:
“The already approved tourism campsites would serve the local urban areas
by keeping people in the area to shop, eat, buy gifts, recreate. Condos
and townhouses are not what people expect to see in a scenic area.”
Gorge Commission
Planner Tom Ascher presented the preliminary results of these workshops at
the June 12 CRGC Public Meeting and pointed out areas that will warrant
special attention.
“The workshops
were very useful,” said Ascher. “The windsurfing site is very sensitive;
you can’t simply add parking to preserve the recreational experience. We
have to work on ways to protect and enhance the experience.”
The workshops were
also beneficial to the public, according to Gorge Commission Planning
Manager Brian Litt. He felt that attendees at the workshops had gained a
clearer understanding that what the Commission was currently considering
was an amendment to the NSA Act, not the Broughton Landing proposal.
“The public has a
better understanding of the nuances behind this complicated process,” Litt
said.
A number of the
CRGC commissioners were also impressed by the quality of public input.
“I attend last
night’s (June 11) meeting and the testimony was very reasonable and
balanced,” said Washington Gorge Commissioner Jane Jacobsen. “It seems
like we will be able to progress from the ideas collected.”
There was some
disagreement of exactly how the commission should proceed with development
of the amendment proposal. Under the timeline currently in place a draft
proposal should be written by the end of next month and a final copy would
be available for public hearings in October.
CRGC Multnomah
County Commissioner Jim Middaugh felt that the commissioners should be
actively involved in the process.
Hood River County
Gorge Commissioner Joyce Reinig, however, was hesitant.
“I understand
Jim’s reasoning about wanting to be involved in the process,” said Reinig.
“But how will it fit the time frame? This might delay the process. One of
the concerns at last night’s (June 11) meeting was that we weren’t moving
forward so that the public had something of substance to comment on.”
Middaugh countered
by saying that “It would be better for the committee to be involved and
know what is going on ... so that we don’t wind up with a knot at the
end.”