$34,000 assessment too much,
east
Hood River
residents tell cityBy RAELYNN RICARTE
News staff writer
October 24, 2007
Citizens on the east side of Hood River have
objected to paying an average bill of $34,000 per property for
street improvements.
Bob Francis, city manager, said residents in
the 16-block area are protesting the costs involved in the $5.5
million project.
He said staffers will now go back to the
drawing board and look for less expensive ways to alleviate
safety concerns.
“The neighbors, I think, did not see a need
for doing this. They like the way things are right now,” said
Francis.
At issue is the widening of narrow streets
running up the hillside off the State Street entrance into Hood
River. Francis said emergency vehicles are sometimes unable to
reach a residence on a steep slope if cars are parked along the
roadways.
He said sewer, water and storm water drain
services also need to be improved along Bluff Drive, East Fourth
Street, East Third Street, Hazel Drive, Lover’s Lane, Serpentine
Road, Sherman Avenue and East Eugene.
Seaborn Engineering of Hood River, the
consultant firm hired by the city, came up with the
multi-million dollar figure to accomplish that work. City
Engineer Dave Bick presented that information to neighbors at a
meeting in early November.
Bick fielded the idea of forming a Local
Improvement District — but the 50 people in attendance were not
buying that plan. They did not want a special tax on their
properties. That assessment would be based on the linear footage
of land that bordered the street.
Francis said some citizens with smaller lots
were looking at a $12,500 fee. But owners of larger tracts would
have been asked to absorb an $110,000 cost. He said the payments
could have been made with a lien on property or over time with a
low-interest loan.
“When you, as a landowner, are being asked to
pay that much money it’s pretty hard to see the benefit of the
project,” said Francis. “The city certainly understands that
concern so we’ll look at other ways to get this work done.”
He said eastside residents were also
concerned that widening the streets would bring more traffic
into the area. They believed that emergency responder worries
could be dealt with by limiting on-street parking where passage
was especially narrow.
“I think people in these neighborhoods will
be able to help us come up with some solutions,” said Francis.
He said the aging infrastructure in the area
does still need to be replaced. So, the city will be scouting
out new ways to finance that work.
Francis said the proposal to form a Local
Improvement District along Columbia Street has received a warmer
reception from neighbors. But the cost for each affected
property owner in the 10-block area will average much less, at
$7,000-9,000.
Landowners are being asked to bear the cost
for $900,000 of the $2.1 million project. Francis said the aging
sewer main from 10th to 20th streets is in dire need of
replacement. He said that line is vital to the system since it
accepts wastewater from the entire southwest sector of the city.
He said, on the aesthetic side, the city would also like to
replace crumbing sidewalks, underground electric lines, and make
driveway cuts in the concrete to accommodate off-street parking.