News Tips
Letters to Editor
Subscriptions
Classified Ads
Legal Notices
Contact Info


Gorge Weather


HOME

 

Highway 35 a year later

Flood zone fix: What to do about 35?

By SUE RYAN
News staff writer
November 5, 2007

Federal and state agencies held the first open house Monday to hear from the public what they think of alternatives to fix Highway 35.

Following last year’s debris flows that blew out part of the road, the federal government came up with $47 million (use to include design and construction) for a more permanent fix.

“Every three to five years these (repairs) keep happening. The status quo just isn’t cutting it anymore and it’s too important of a transportation corridor to just continue to let it get beat up,” said George Fekaris.

He manages the project for the Western Lands Federal Highway Administration. The agency is working together with the Oregon Department of Transportation and U.S. Forest Service.

Fekaris was at the Hood River Inn Monday during the first open house in the process. At this stage, the agencies are taking comments from citizens on the draft alternatives which came out of a 2003 study. While that study focused on seven areas, this project will concern only three.

That includes the White River, Newton and Clark creeks. Debris flows have come from the White River Glacier and the river channel as far back as 1907 and since 1978 for the Newton-Clark Glacier.

Agency records show complete washouts of the White River Bridge or approaches have occurred cyclically, including 2000 and 2006.

The draft alternatives focus on steps to keep the current bridge over the White River, Newton and Clark creeks in place but raise it substantially or shift the highway upstream or downstream.

Fekaris said any potential move of Highway 35 would require a much more substantial process since it would involve federal forest lands and the federal Wild and Scenic River Act.

“The 2003 study is certainly a springboard but we know it’s an active mountain, alive and kicking,” he said. “Our geo-tech people keep reminding us of that.”

For the White River, those proposed measures include separate alternatives such as raising the road and lengthening the bridge, realigning the bridge upstream, building a tunnel, encasing the highway, realigning the highway downstream or building a bypass.

The alternative to relocate the highway would use U.S. Highway 26 and sections of Forest Service Roads 43 and 48 to bypass the White River site.

Alternatives for Clark Creek and Newton Creek looked at placing large rocks (known as rip rapping) along the existing stream bank and culverts, creating an armored dry channel, building a bypass to relocate the highway to the east side of the East Fork of the Hood River, raising the roadway with intermittent channel crossings, raising the roadway on a permeable embankment or building a bridge.

The agencies are accepting comments on the draft alternatives until Dec. 15.