|
November 21, 2007
By RAELYNN RICARTE
News staff writer
Hood River County’s administrative
employees plan to strike next week over a contract dispute
involving health care coverage and retroactive wages.
Unless a last-minute agreement is
reached, Local 1082 members of the American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees say they will walk the picket
line Thursday, Nov. 29.
They will carry signs of protest
outside entrances to the courthouse, library and administration
building, each located on State Street. In addition, striking
workers will stand outside the health department, 1109 June St.
The county and union hold disparate
views about how the impasse in negotiations has occurred.
AFSCME’s stance is that a
compromise was reached after eight months of bargaining about
the amount of health care coverage that would be paid by some
part-time workers. The union claims the county changed the
effective date of the employees’ 3 percent wage increase to Jan.
1, 2008, instead of making it retroactive to July 1, 2007, as
previously agreed.
“It has been the county dragging
its feet constantly throughout these negotiations,” said Don
Loving, AFSCME public affairs director.
“It’s not our fault it’s taken so
long in these negotiations, and our members are unwilling to be
punished by having their cost-of-living delayed by six months
because of the county’s sluggish pace of negotiating.”
Bruce Bischof, attorney for the
county, refuted that charge. He said the county has always come
to the mediation table when the state has scheduled a session.
He said the management bargaining team’s final contract offer is
the same as the one which union representatives agreed upon
during a prior mediation session.
“There has been no compromise on
anything. Those facts are fundamentally wrong,” he said. “We are
staying with the proposal that the union agreed to and then
reneged on.”
The county’s contract proposal
provides for retroactivity of employee wages back to July. But
nine part-time single workers are asked to pay $196 per month
toward their health care premiums.
Bischof said the union’s final
proposal asked that all employees continue to receive 100
percent coverage. He said the county would have to foot a much
higher bill because of premium increases. He said a discussion
took place during the last mediation session of paying the extra
expenses by moving back the raises — but no action was ever
taken.
Members of Local 1082 soundly
rejected the initial agreement worked out with the county by
their bargaining team. They felt it was unfair that some
employees get all of their coverage paid while others were
called upon to pay half the cost of premiums.
Loving said it was unusual to have
members not ratify a contract that had been negotiated, but they
always had that right.
“Yes, we had a tentative agreement
and 95 percent of the time the key word in the phrase is
agreement. But in this case, the key word turned out to be
tentative,” he said.
“It’s not a contract unless it’s
signed. Period. That’s the way our members feel,” said Hoby
Hansen, president of Local 1082.
He said having all workers covered
equally would cost the county about $72,000 more in premiums
over the three-year life of the contract.
On Tuesday, the county began
advertising for applicants to cover the gaps in services that
will be left by striking workers. The 52 members of Local 1082
staff these departments: Budget and Finance, Planning/Building,
Health, Library and Records and Assessment. Also included are
employees from Justice Court and the District Attorney’s office. |