Political system must find a home for compassion

Another Voice


Special to the News

Did you see him? He was near the on-ramp down by the Hood River Bridge. He was in a wheelchair. His right leg was gone just below the knee. He was holding a sign for passing cars to see. It read “Homeless Vet.”

I have not been able to get the vision out of my mind. I thought that it would go away, fade, get buried in the busyness of my life, but it hasn’t. Therefore, I’ve surrendered to that part of me that won’t let the image fade and it is that part of me that you’re listening to now. We all have that part of ourselves, the part that knows when something is wrong. We, myself included, usually look the other way, ignore it, and bury it under the busyness of our lives. We carry on assuming that someone is working on the problem, so I don’t have to deal with this now. Besides, I can barely support myself let alone a homeless person. Am I alone, or do you say these things to yourself too?

I just can’t understand why a country as rich and powerful as the United States should have ANY homeless people, let alone a veteran who lost his leg fighting in our army. There have been people sleeping under the Burnside Bridge in Portland for as long as I can remember. I moved here in 1989. This is not acceptable! Not only is it not acceptable, but also it’s crazy! We are superior creatures; we’re smart, imaginative, and enormously capable! We can do so much better than this. Can’t we? Don’t we have the capability to take care of our people?

Then why aren’t we doing it? I have a theory as to why there are so many “things” wrong. I am thinking lately that OUR government doesn’t exist. Oh yes, there is A government, but observation shows me that it’s not OUR government. I believe now that there is a level in politics, probably somewhere around the federal Representative/Senator level, or perhaps lower, where it becomes so expensive to run a campaign that politicians must start to operate in the interests of those entities that fund their campaigns rather than operate in the interests of the People.

I also believe that there ARE very good people ready to work in our political system to make things like homelessness a thing of the past, but they never get placed before us to be voted upon because working in the best interests of the people won’t get them the money they need to buy 30-second spots on television. Television and radio campaigns cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Only through large special interest donations can funds like those be raised. At that point, a politician begins working for the interests of the sponsors and not for us. There is no money to be made by providing homes for the homeless.

The original “constitutional” government and willing participants are out there, waiting to be brought forth, but until there is free airtime for all candidates, we’ll never see them. We’ll only see on television and hear on radio those candidates who will do the bidding of the interests that fund them. We might have to look a little deeper than major networks and newspapers to find the candidates who would represent the people. In the 2000 election, many people didn’t even know there were more than two candidates for president.

Pay close attention to who gets “commercials” for 2004; they’ll be all bought and paid for.


Scot Bergeron lives in Cook, Wash.

News and information from our partners


Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site. A user's first several comments must be manually approved by a moderator.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

socialjay 1 year, 4 months ago

what message is this story trying to give out? any help


Sign in to comment


Information from the News and our advertisers (Want to add your business to this to this feed?)