A not so clear-cut clearcut, Part 3

The wound has already started healing.

Some of the 80-odd acres of trees cut down on tribal land in Columbia Gorge Scenic area have already been replanted. The remainder of the 110-acre clearcut is expected to be replanted later this spring.

The trees will grow back. But what sort of future will they grow back into is up in the air.

Groups such as Friends of the Gorge contend that private logging is not an allowed use on any open space lands in the scenic area.

SDS Lumber, which owns 30 acres which were logged, and owns 80 additional acres next to those which were already clearcut, said the National Scenic Area Act puts all non-federal timber lands under the jurisdiction of the state Forest Practices Act, and that the Gorge Commission would have no grounds to prevent them from logging.

The Oregon Department of Forestry, which manages the Oregon Forestry Practices Act, approved the logging operation.

Over the past several months the Columbia Gorge Commission has conducted an internal investigation of the process leading up to the clearcut.

What wound up being exposed was more than just a now barren hillside in the Gorge — it was numerous missed opportunities by multiple agencies to either raise red flags about the clearcut or to potentially stop it.

“No person contacted the Gorge Commission prior to the timber harvest or at the time the Oregon Department of Forestry received the original notification of the timber harvest in GMA open space,” the report states.

The area which was logged presents an interesting case in interagency cooperation. Within the 110 acres, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, tribal representatives, the Gorge Commission, Hood River County, the Oregon Department of Forestry and the U.S. Forest Service all hold some level of sway.

Even when each agency thinks it has perfectly clear guidance, how that guidance applies to other agencies is not always so simple.

The ODF is tasked with regulating non-federal forestlands in the state, and are given the explicit authority to manage those lands in the Gorge Scenic Area under the Gorge Scenic Act.

The ODF’s own internal guidance for working with other agencies, in this case the Gorge commission, states that “in Oregon, ODF regulates forest practices in the GMA (if forest operations are allowed in the zone). There are some zones, such as ‘Open Space,’ that do not allow forest operations.”

The guidelines also state that for all operations within the scenic area’s General Management Area, the ODF should contact the U.S. Forest Service, the Gorge Commission and the affected county.

Just a few paragraphs later, though, the guidance states that while the ODF regulates forest practices in the management area “enforcement of zoning provisions that prohibit forest practices in the GMA are not the responsibility of ODF and are left to the Commission (or the county).”

“There were several missed opportunities in a number of different conversations … it would be unfair to lay the blame on any one agency,” said Gorge Commission Director Darren Nichols.

Later this month the Gorge Commission staff will be meeting with representatives from ODF and USFS to work on ensuring better communication in the future.

Nichols said he has traded messages with Mosier city councilwoman Kathy Fitzpatrick about having The Gorge Commission, along with the BIA and ODF come to Mosier to discuss how the clearcut came about.

Fitzpatrick is concerned about protecting Mosier’s economy, which has seen a boost from use of the portion of the Historic Columbia River Highway trail which connects Hood River and Mosier. The clearcut is just above that trail.

Friends of the Columbia Gorge shares Fitzpatrick’s concern with protecting the trail and the lands which surround it.

“Even though the trees are cut, what could emerge is better public involvement … and better implementation of mitigation of clearcuts,” said Friends of the Gorge Conservation Director Michael Lang. “We’re looking for solutions; we haven’t filed any lawsuits … our interest is identifying what went wrong and making sure it doesn’t happen again. There is an economic value to protecting this section of the historic highway.”

Nichols also said he is hoping to also discuss communication with the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

While improved communication may help each agency know what the other is doing, it cannot answer the deep legal question which the Gorge Commission needs answering:

Does the commission have the authority to prevent logging on Open Space lands?

The prohibition of Open Space forestry is based on the Commission’s management plan and its authority to zone land within the scenic area. That authority to zone land was reinforced in a letter from the Oregon Attorney General’s office in 1990 which states that the scenic area act “provides the commission with exclusive authority to designate the use of non-federal lands as ‘forest lands’ within the scenic area.”

However, as the Gorge Commission report on the logging notes, the letter did not establish whether the power to zone lands actually provides the Commission with the authority to regulate or enforce upon uses in the open space areas.

Instead, the letter merely noted that the “savings provision” in the Scenic Area Act, which puts non-federal forestry operations under the purview of the Oregon and Washington Forestry Practices Acts, cannot prevent the Gorge Commission from zoning land, and that zoning and the other provisions of the savings clause are two different issues.

Gorge Commission Executive Director Darren Nichols said he has contacted the Oregon Attorney General’s office to have the letter updated, and hopes that the Washington and Oregon attorneys general can work together to provide consistent guidance on the matter.

Nichols said he had not yet been able to connect with the Washington Attorney General’s office, but had spoken with the head of the Natural Resources division at the Oregon Department of Justice about refreshing the 1990 guidance letter.

“We want them to start with 1990 advice letter to flesh it out and answer the questions between the act and the management plan,” Nichols said. “Specifically if the Gorge commission has the authority to prohibit or otherwise regulate timber management in the GMA open space zone.”

Without clear legal guidance, a Gorge Commission already weakened by budget cuts, could find its hands further tied to regulate logging in the National Scenic Area it is tasked to protect.

“As a steward of Gorge resources and the region’s primary leadership body, the Commission should convene appropriate regional partners to resolve resource management issues as they arise,” states the Commission’s report.

As for just how to do that, “[O]nce we have more detailed legal opinion from Attorney General’s office that will give us a more certain starting point,” Nichols said.

In the meantime, saplings will soon be growing in the clearcut area, while their future, and what sort of protection they will enjoy, awaits sorting out.

“Some of the BIA area has already been replanted, and SDS will be planting later this fall,” ODF spokesman Kevin Weeks said. “While it is certainly quite noticeable now, steps are being taken to replant trees and in a few years that will grow back to being a lush forest.”

News and information from our partners


Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site. A user's first several comments must be manually approved by a moderator.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

JohnHendry 5 years, 5 months ago

“While it is certainly quite noticeable now, steps are being taken to replant trees and in a few years that will grow back to being a lush forest.”

What kind of lush forest? One designed by wishful thinking or one designed by Nature that works as part of the whole eco-system being removed? This entire area is and has been at its best a product of wishful thinking by good ol boys who are not scientists to understand their actions gaining from its natural resources taking too fast as a result of always wanting "more" feeding an economy of the same business plan. Here they took from the wrong place but so what? Monkey see monkey do because no one is going to do anything about the monkey business going on, and the more they see the more the monkeys do till they reach the inevitable point of war extending beyond each other as the supply of whatever is wanted stops and physics must balance out the forces with a new supply of energy called everyone's ass on the line..... next up.

Look across the river and look at what they did to what was once a primer paragliding site that attracted people from around the world. Even with the hill side tree cutting activity generating food the Hawks avoid the air turbulence where there was once smooth air currents lifting them up. These turbulent new conditions are deadly to a paraglider because they can collapse the shape of it being a self-inflated wing and when that happens at the low altitudes they fly even if they survive it can be horrendous.

There's more to a forest than the trees but chainsaws don't see it that way if there's a bank in sight and wood along the way. And that’s the bottom line proving it takes a fool to fool a fool but you can’t fool time and what happens to you when you get there. Its just sad the children of this world are being handed such insane basic living conditions after their grandparents ignored the huge almost endless miles of garbage landfills controlled and “built” over time by people getting in on the good stuff the politicians let slip by like Hanford’s nuclear chemical mess NOT being cleaned up creating overall much poorer odds of a survival chance than their parents had. This is not the right way to prove evolution is in control but it’s one way and it’s working.


Sign in to comment


Information from the News and our advertisers (Want to add your business to this to this feed?)